Fresh Frozen, In-Alcohol, or Autologous Costal Cartilage? Analysis of Complications in Over 650 Revision Rhinoplasties.

BACKGROUND: When autologous septal cartilage is not enough or even not disposable for graft sculpting in revision rhinoplasty, valid alternatives have to be found. Both autologous and homologous costal cartilage usage has been described in scientific literature. As there is no universally accepted consensus on the cartilage choice to use in these cases, the experiences with the different types of cartilage usage assume significant importance in the rhinoplasty learning process. OBJECTIVES: This multicenter prospective study outlined an overview of the authors' experience regarding short-term and long-term complications following revision rhinoplasty procedures in which either fresh frozen (FFCC), in-alcohol (IACC) or autologous costal cartilage (ACC) was used. METHODS: 671 patients undergoing revision rhinoplasty from June 2015 to September 2020 were divided into three groups according to the type of cartilage used (Group1/FFCC with 212 patients, group2/IACC with 239 patients and group3/ACC with 202 cases). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and short and long-term complications were described and discussed. A statistical analysis investigating a possible significance of the differences in complication rate was conducted. RESULTS: Authors' data outlined a short-term general complication rate of 5.05%, and a long-term complication rate of 7.04%. A statistically significant difference was identified in cartilage warping rate between the homologous cartilages in comparison to ACC. CONCLUSIONS: FFCC, IACC and ACC can be safely used in revision rhinoplasty with no statistically significant differences regarding short- and long-term complications rate. Cartilage warping rate is significantly higher for ACC in comparison with FFCC and IACC.

Correction of Rectus Abdominis Diastasis: A Prospective Comparative Study Between a New Suturable Polypropylene Mesh Vs Polypropylene Standard Suture Plication.

BACKGROUND: Duramesh is a new suturing concept, combining the principles of meshes with the precision, flexibility and versatility of a suture, suitable also for Abdominal Rectus Diastasis correction. OBJECTIVES: This prospective research aimed at comparing this mesh usage versus the polypropylene standard suture plication for Rectus Diastasis repair in terms of safety (infection, seroma, hematoma, surgical wound dehiscence and fistula rates and hospital stay), effectiveness (ARD recurrence evidenced through Ultrasound Sonography, palpability of the muscular suture, surgical time and postoperative pain evaluation) and satisfaction of the patients based on PROMs (BODY-Q). METHODS: 65 of the initial 70 patients, undergoing rectus diastasis repair, with a 6 months FU, were randomly divided in two groups: 1 composed of 33 patients treated with Duramesh and 2 of 32 patients treated with standard polypropylene 0 suture plication. Data regarding infection, seroma, hematoma, surgical wound dehiscence and fistula rates, hospital stay, ARD recurrence, palpability of the muscular suture, surgical time, postoperative pain evaluation (VAS) and PROMs (BODY-Q) were analyzed by Prism9. RESULTS: No significant differences were reported between the two groups in terms of: infection, seroma, hematoma, surgical wound dehiscence and fistula rates and hospital stay. The mesh usage decreases the time required to perform plication compared with standard polypropylene detached stitches suture. No statistically significant differences were found out regarding VAS and BODY-Q data. CONCLUSIONS: Duramesh 0 application for Rectus Diastasis repair is safe and effective without compromising aesthetic improvement, as compared to standard polypropylene 0 plication.

Relevance of Self-Consciousness of Appearance on Patient Satisfaction in Primary Rhinoplasty: a 12-Month Follow-up Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Rhinoplasty procedure has a strong impact on patient quality of life. Plastic surgery patients show a degree of appearance-related distress higher than general population, especially patients undergoing rhinoplasty. Relationship between patient-reported outcome after rhinoplasty and self-consciousness of appearance needs further studies. The aim of this study is to investigate this correlation, considering the surgeon external evaluation as well. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 consecutive patients underwent primary cosmetofunctional rhinoseptoplasty. Appearance-related distress and surgical outcome were assessed by DAS59 (Derriford Appearance Scale 59) and SCHNOS (Standardised Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey), administered before and after surgery. Follow-up period was 12 months. Third-party clinical outcome was evaluated by three plastic surgeons by a scale ranging from 1 (poor outcome) to 5 (excellent outcome). RESULTS: A first division in Group 1 (satisfied) and Group 2 (unsatisfied) was done. DAS59 mean score in Group 1 showed to be statistically lower than Group 2 (p value < 0.05). Spearman's test showed a large strong positive correlation between preoperative and postoperative DAS59 and SCHNOS-C score variations (Delta 0-12 months) (r = 0.7514, p<0.001), as well as between DAS59 and SCHNOS-O (r = 0.5117, p<0.001) and between SCHNOS-C and SCHNOS-O (r = 0.6928, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Rhinoseptoplasty has a significant impact on the patient self-consciousness of appearance, in both negative and positive terms. We emphasize the surgeon's burden, who need to carefully assess and address the patient's expectations during the first evaluation. This distinction is crucial since unrealistic expectations may lead to dissatisfaction even after a properly performed procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Main Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction After Primary Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

BACKGROUND: Primary breast augmentation is one of the most sought-after procedures in cosmetic surgery. It is generally related to a high degree of patient satisfaction, but it is not always obvious which factors have greater influence on patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate how anthropometric, psychological, and social parameters, in association with the main surgical variables, influenced patients' satisfaction with their breasts after surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary breast augmentation between October 2018 and February 2022, who completed a 12-month follow-up without complications, were enrolled in the study. For each patient we recorded: BMI, pinch test (upper pole of the breast), surgical access, implant pocket, implant volume, bra size increase, age, smoking habit, civil status, education level, pregnancies, and psychiatric disorders. Each variable was statistically correlated with patient's satisfaction, assessed by BREAST-Q questionnaire preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Analyzing the data of the 131 patients, we found 3 factors affecting their satisfaction (P<.05); BMI: underweight patients were less satisfied than normal and overweight patients; pinch test: patients with a pinch test >2 cm were more satisfied; volume of the implant and bra size increase: patients with implant volume <300 cc and a less than 2 bra size increase were less satisfied than patients with larger augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: BMI, pinch test, implant volume, and extent of volumetric enhancement should be taken into careful consideration by the surgeon during preoperative consultation and surgical planning, because they can be critical to patient satisfaction.

Breast Augmentation in the Digital Era: The Power of Social Media in a Surgeon's New Practice.

BACKGROUND: Opening a new practice is always challenging, and one of the main problems is how to engage patients. Most of them use social media to gather information about surgery and surgeons. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate social media's impact on a new practice, compared with a long-standing practice run by the same surgeon. Furthermore, changes in patients' and surgeons' perspectives regarding social media in recent years were studied. METHODS: In the 2 aforementioned practices, a questionnaire was administered to patients seen in consultation for primary breast augmentation regarding their interaction with social media before booking the visit. Another questionnaire was administered to 152 surgeons to assess their perceptions of social media. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-seven patients in Italy and 129 in Sweden answered the questionnaire. In the first year of the Italian practice, 97.2% of patients booked a consultation with the surgeon thanks to social media; after 3 years, the percentage dropped to 68.02%. Comparing Italian and Swedish patients, 68.02% vs 28.68%, respectively, booked a consultation with the surgeon specifically thanks to social media, 91.09% vs 79.84% did research about the surgeon before booking a consultation, and 36.03% vs 10.08% contacted the surgeon before booking an appointment. One hundred fifty-two surgeons from 24 different countries answered the questionnaire, and 77.9% opined that social media positively affected their practice. CONCLUSIONS: Social media is fundamental in patient-surgeon interaction and can strongly influence patient inflow, especially at the beginning of a new practice. Surgeons should be capable of using these tools to engage patients, bearing in mind the important role of these media in patients' education.

An Original Approach to Massive Weight Loss Deformities in the Lower Thigh: A Retrospective Assessment of Results and Patients' Satisfaction.

INTRODUCTION: Massive weight loss (MWL) patients present skin and soft-tissue laxity and ptosis involving inner thighs. Previous efforts were focused on the upper two thirds of the thigh, while literature has never dealt specifically with lower thigh contouring. We present an original approach to the lower inner thigh, intended for patients who already had upper thigh lift, discussing outcomes, advantages, and limits of our technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen female MWL patients with persisting severe deformities in the lower inner thigh, following an upper thigh lift, received lower third medial thigh contouring, through concurrent liposuction and skin excision, between 2017 and 2019. The excision pattern consisted of an inferiorly-based vertical triangular component, centered on the inner midline, and a distal horizontal crescent, resulting in an inverted-T scar. Our series was retrospectively investigated, comparing preoperative and 12-month postoperative pictures and assessing the outcomes by means of a tailor-made 11-item survey. RESULTS: Three patients had minor complications (two cases of skin de-epithelization at the wound margin, one granuloma). Photographic assessment showed a 15.9% transverse diameter reduction (p<0.05). The questionnaire showed encouraging scores for all the investigated items. Mean overall satisfaction was 9.6/10. CONCLUSION: Despite the retrospective design and the limited sample size, in consideration of the applicability of this technique in selected cases, and the need for a two-step procedure, separate upper and lower thigh contouring, the results of our study showed a considerable improvement of the inner thighs by our personal combined liposuction and lower medial thigh lift approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Correlation Between the Improvement in Patient's Quality of Life and Surgeon's Satisfaction Following Primary Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is the primary goal in breast augmentation, but in a few cases patient satisfaction and surgeon satisfaction are in disagreement. OBJECTIVES: The authors try to explain the reasons associated with disparity between patient and surgeon satisfaction. METHODS: Seventy-one patients who underwent primary breast augmentation with dual-plane technique, with inframammary or inferior hemi-periareolar incision, were enrolled in this prospective study. Quality of life was evaluated with BREAST-Q preoperatively and postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative photographic analysis was performed by a heterogeneous group of experts who completed the validated Breast Aesthetic Scale (BAS). The patient satisfaction score was compared with the overall appearance as determined by the validated BAS; a difference in score of 1 or more was considered a discordant judgement. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 18.0, with values of P < .01 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: BREAST-Q analysis showed a significative improvement in quality of life on the psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, and physical well-being chest scale and satisfaction with the breast (P < .01). Of the 71 pairs, 60 had a concordant judgment between patient and surgeon, and 11 were discordant. The score expressed by the patients (4.35 ± 0.69) was on average higher than that of the third-party observers (3.88 ± 0.58), with P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction is the main goal following the success of a surgical or medical procedure. BREAST-Q and photographs during the preoperative period are helpful to understanding the patient's real expectations.

Puboplasty as an integral step in massive weight loss abdominal contouring: a retrospective assessment of results, stability, and patients' satisfaction.

Ex-obese patients complain about abdomen and pubis deformities following massive weight loss, due to skin and soft tissue redundancy. Abdominoplasty is often the first corrective procedure performed, but residual mons pubis deformities may impair the final outcome, thus concomitant correction becomes necessary. Sixty patients were treated by the same surgeon between 2008 and 2018, 30 of them receiving only standard umbilical transposition abdominoplasty (A group), and 30 having concurrent monsplasty (AM group), namely skin excess removal, pubic suspension and skin redistribution following superolateral vectors, re-establishment of superficial fascia continuity, with or without liposuction. Retrospective comparison of the two groups included: a subjective evaluation through administration of questionnaires (BODY-QTM, a questionnaire assessing functional and aesthetic improvements after surgery, a questionnaire assessing the overall satisfaction), and an objective evaluation of pre- and post-operative pictures to estimate mons pubis suspension and result stability. Four minor complications were recorded: 1 wound dehiscence in A group, 3 seromas in AM group. All measured outcomes were higher in AM group, with statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in almost all the questionnaire and BODY-QTM items, and the photographic assessment confirmed higher degree of mons pubis suspension and superior result stability in AM group. We presented a standardized approach to mons pubis reshaping during abdominoplasty, through a straightforward, safe and quick procedure. Our experience supports the significance of the concomitant correction of abdominal and mons pubis deformities, improving the results of the surgery from both a subjective and objective point of view.